The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review (Record no. 48318)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01916nam a2200181Ia 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
| control field | MX-MdCICY |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250625153935.0 |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
| Transcribing agency | CICY |
| 090 ## - LOCALLY ASSIGNED LC-TYPE CALL NUMBER (OCLC); LOCAL CALL NUMBER (RLIN) | |
| Classification number (OCLC) (R) ; Classification number, CALL (RLIN) (NR) | B-14123 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 250602s9999 xx |||||s2 |||| ||und|d |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review |
| 490 0# - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Volume/sequential designation | Research Policy, 30(3), p.509-532, 2001 |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | This article critically reviews the literature on the economic benefits of publicly funded basic research. In that literature, three main methodological approaches have been adopted - econometric studies, surveys and case studies. Econometric studies are subject to certain methodological limitations but they suggest that the economic benefits are very substantial. These studies have also highlighted the importance of spillovers and the existence of localisation effects in research. From the literature based on surveys and on case studies, it is clear that the benefits from public investment in basic research can take a variety of forms. We classify these into six main categories, reviewing the evidence on the nature and extent of each type. The relative importance of these different forms of benefit apparently varies with scientific field, technology and industrial sector. Consequently, no simple model of the economic benefits from basic research is possible. We reconsider the rationale for government funding of basic research, arguing that the traditional 'market failure' justification needs to be extended to take account of these different forms of benefit from basic research. The article concludes by identifying some of the policy implications that follow from this review. |
| 700 12 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Salter, A.J. |
| 700 12 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Martin, B.R. |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N02RkzAtfX2cyMJuB4CEqyeODtYbdTZZ/view?usp=drivesdk">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N02RkzAtfX2cyMJuB4CEqyeODtYbdTZZ/view?usp=drivesdk</a> |
| Public note | Para ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta: @cicy.edu.mx |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme | Clasificación local |
| Koha item type | Documentos solicitados |
| Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Collection | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total checkouts | Full call number | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clasificación local | Ref1 | CICY | CICY | Documento préstamo interbibliotecario | 25.06.2025 | B-14123 | 25.06.2025 | 25.06.2025 | Documentos solicitados |