MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
| fixed length control field |
02247nam a2200241Ia 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
| control field |
MX-MdCICY |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
| control field |
20250625162416.0 |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
| Transcribing agency |
CICY |
| 090 ## - LOCALLY ASSIGNED LC-TYPE CALL NUMBER (OCLC); LOCAL CALL NUMBER (RLIN) |
| Classification number (OCLC) (R) ; Classification number, CALL (RLIN) (NR) |
B-18672 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
| fixed length control field |
250602s9999 xx |||||s2 |||| ||und|d |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT |
| Title |
Using the right tool for the job: the difference between unsupervised and supervised analyses of multivariate ecological data. |
| 490 0# - SERIES STATEMENT |
| Volume/sequential designation |
Oecologia, 196(1), p.13-25, 2021 |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
| Summary, etc. |
Ecologists often collect data with the aim of determining which of many variables are associated with a particular cause or consequence. Unsupervised analyses (e.g. principal components analysis, PCA)summarize variation in the data, without regard to the response. Supervised analyses (e.g., partial least squares, PLS)evaluate the variables to find the combination that best explain a causal relationship. These approaches are not interchangeable, especially when the variables most responsible for a causal relationship are not the greatest source of overall variation in the data-a situation that ecologists are likely to encounter. To illustrate the differences between unsupervised and supervised techniques, we analyze a published dataset using both PCA and PLS and compare the questions and answers associated with each method. We also use simulated datasets representing situations that further illustrate differences between unsupervised and supervised analyses. For simulated data with many correlated variables that were unrelated to the response, PLS was better than PCA at identifying which variables were associated with the response. There are many applications for both unsupervised and supervised approaches in ecology. However, PCA is currently overused, at least in part because supervised approaches, such as PLS, are less familiar. |
| 650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS (PCA) |
| 650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES (PLS)REGRESSION |
| 650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS REGRESSION |
| 650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
}MULTIVARIATE STATISTICS |
| 650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
SUPERVISED ANALYSES |
| 700 12 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
| Personal name |
Scott, E. R. |
| 700 12 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
| Personal name |
Crone, E. E |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
| Uniform Resource Identifier |
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/17w3T7V6uinhDW0EQPZtOXGPGlr61a0Z7/view?usp=drivesdk">https://drive.google.com/file/d/17w3T7V6uinhDW0EQPZtOXGPGlr61a0Z7/view?usp=drivesdk</a> |
| Public note |
Para ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta: @cicy.edu.mx |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Clasificación local |
| Koha item type |
Documentos solicitados |