Domestication, crop breeding, and genetic modification are fundamentally different processes: implications for seed sovereignty and agrobiodiversity (Record no. 54720)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02401nam a2200229Ia 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field MX-MdCICY
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250625162452.0
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Transcribing agency CICY
090 ## - LOCALLY ASSIGNED LC-TYPE CALL NUMBER (OCLC); LOCAL CALL NUMBER (RLIN)
Classification number (OCLC) (R) ; Classification number, CALL (RLIN) (NR) B-20634
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 250602s9999 xx |||||s2 |||| ||und|d
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Domestication, crop breeding, and genetic modification are fundamentally different processes: implications for seed sovereignty and agrobiodiversity
490 0# - SERIES STATEMENT
Volume/sequential designation Agriculture and Human Values, 39(1), p.455-472, 2022
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Genetic modification (GM)of crop plants is frequently described by its proponents as a continuation of the ancient process of domestication. While domestication, crop breeding, and GM all modify the genomes and phenotypes of plants, GM fundamentally differs from domestication in terms of the biological and sociopolitical processes by which change occurs, and the subsequent impacts on agrobiodiversity and seed sovereignty. We review the history of domestication, crop breeding, and GM, and show that crop breeding and GM are continuous with each other in many important ways, but represent a momentous break from domestication because they move plant evolution off of farms and into centralized institutions. The social contexts in which these processes unfold dictate who holds rights to germplasm and agricultural knowledge, shape incentives to effect particular kinds of changes in our crops, and create or constrict biodiversity. Presenting GM as a continuation of domestication puts forward a false equivalency that fundamentally misrepresents how domestication, crop breeding, and GM occur. In doing so, this narrative diminishes public understanding of these important processes and obscures the effects of industrial agriculture on in situ biodiversity and the practice of farming. This misrepresentation is used in public-facing science communication by representatives of the biotechnology industry to silence meaningful debate on GM by convincing the public that it is the continuation of an age-old process that underlies all agricultural societies.
650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element DOMESTICATION
650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element CROP BREEDING
650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element GENETIC MODIFICATION
650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element AGROBIODIVERSITY
700 12 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Mueller, N. G.
700 12 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Flachs, A.
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RVVizH7uWAY2F5ofF3GIBSJYxP4g8R_S/view?usp=drivesdk">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RVVizH7uWAY2F5ofF3GIBSJYxP4g8R_S/view?usp=drivesdk</a>
Public note Para ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta: @cicy.edu.mx
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Clasificación local
Koha item type Documentos solicitados
Holdings
Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Collection Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total checkouts Full call number Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
  Clasificación local     Ref1 CICY CICY Documento préstamo interbibliotecario 25.06.2025   B-20634 25.06.2025 25.06.2025 Documentos solicitados