MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
| fixed length control field |
02401nam a2200229Ia 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
| control field |
MX-MdCICY |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
| control field |
20250625162452.0 |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
| Transcribing agency |
CICY |
| 090 ## - LOCALLY ASSIGNED LC-TYPE CALL NUMBER (OCLC); LOCAL CALL NUMBER (RLIN) |
| Classification number (OCLC) (R) ; Classification number, CALL (RLIN) (NR) |
B-20634 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
| fixed length control field |
250602s9999 xx |||||s2 |||| ||und|d |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT |
| Title |
Domestication, crop breeding, and genetic modification are fundamentally different processes: implications for seed sovereignty and agrobiodiversity |
| 490 0# - SERIES STATEMENT |
| Volume/sequential designation |
Agriculture and Human Values, 39(1), p.455-472, 2022 |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
| Summary, etc. |
Genetic modification (GM)of crop plants is frequently described by its proponents as a continuation of the ancient process of domestication. While domestication, crop breeding, and GM all modify the genomes and phenotypes of plants, GM fundamentally differs from domestication in terms of the biological and sociopolitical processes by which change occurs, and the subsequent impacts on agrobiodiversity and seed sovereignty. We review the history of domestication, crop breeding, and GM, and show that crop breeding and GM are continuous with each other in many important ways, but represent a momentous break from domestication because they move plant evolution off of farms and into centralized institutions. The social contexts in which these processes unfold dictate who holds rights to germplasm and agricultural knowledge, shape incentives to effect particular kinds of changes in our crops, and create or constrict biodiversity. Presenting GM as a continuation of domestication puts forward a false equivalency that fundamentally misrepresents how domestication, crop breeding, and GM occur. In doing so, this narrative diminishes public understanding of these important processes and obscures the effects of industrial agriculture on in situ biodiversity and the practice of farming. This misrepresentation is used in public-facing science communication by representatives of the biotechnology industry to silence meaningful debate on GM by convincing the public that it is the continuation of an age-old process that underlies all agricultural societies. |
| 650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
DOMESTICATION |
| 650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
CROP BREEDING |
| 650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
GENETIC MODIFICATION |
| 650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
AGROBIODIVERSITY |
| 700 12 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
| Personal name |
Mueller, N. G. |
| 700 12 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
| Personal name |
Flachs, A. |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
| Uniform Resource Identifier |
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RVVizH7uWAY2F5ofF3GIBSJYxP4g8R_S/view?usp=drivesdk">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RVVizH7uWAY2F5ofF3GIBSJYxP4g8R_S/view?usp=drivesdk</a> |
| Public note |
Para ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta: @cicy.edu.mx |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Clasificación local |
| Koha item type |
Documentos solicitados |