MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
02606nam a2200241Ia 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| control field |
MX-MdCICY |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
|---|
| control field |
20251009160707.0 |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Transcribing agency |
CICY |
| 090 ## - LOCALLY ASSIGNED LC-TYPE CALL NUMBER (OCLC); LOCAL CALL NUMBER (RLIN) |
|---|
| Classification number (OCLC) (R) ; Classification number, CALL (RLIN) (NR) |
B-21830 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
251009s9999 xx 000 0 und d |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Life cycle assessment of bioethanol production from banana, potato, and papaya waste |
| 490 0# - SERIES STATEMENT |
|---|
| Series statement |
International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 29, p.1846-1862, 2024 |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE |
|---|
| General note |
Artículo |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
Purpose Food waste is considered a potential source for biofuel production, with gaps in the processes that need to be addressed and a necessity to evaluate the environmental, economic, and social impacts of these processes comprehensively to assess their sustainability fully. The aim was to conduct a life cycle assessment (LCA) of bioethanol derived from banana, potato, and papaya waste across three process stages (pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, and fermentation). Methods The process was assessed in two additional stages: one considering energy consumption and the other excluding energy consumption of the equipment used, referred to as non-energy processes. This distinction was made because a laboratory-scale process was utilized, which does not accurately reflect energy costs on a large scale. The study employed Ecoinvent database 3.4 and the ReCiPe 2016 method (midpoint and endpoint) to evaluate impacts, along with Monte Carlo simulation in SimaPro 8.5.0.0 software for uncertainty analysis. Results The LCA revealed that the fermentation stage accounted for the most significant number of impacts and environmental damages in all categories in the complete processes. In the non-energy processes, the pretreatment stage for waste from evaluated foods exhibited the highest impacts and damages. The most significant environmental impacts and damages across all scenarios were global warming potential (GWP) and resources, respectively. Conclusions Banana waste has higher impact than potatoes and papaya. Optimizing processes, using renewable energy, sustainable pH adjustment, and enzyme reuse can enhance sustainability. No studies were found that conducted an LCA of bioethanol production from papaya waste. |
| 650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
BIOETHANOL |
| 650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
LCA |
| 650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
FOOD WASTE |
| 650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS |
| 650 14 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE |
| 700 12 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Fagundes, V. D.;Machado, Ê. L.;de Cássia de Souza Schneider, R.;Colla, L. M. |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
|---|
| Uniform Resource Identifier |
<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZK_v3Fk_7W7h6-wx-QApMcU0R9GtQcz0/view?usp=drive_link">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZK_v3Fk_7W7h6-wx-QApMcU0R9GtQcz0/view?usp=drive_link</a> |
| Public note |
Para ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta: @cicy.edu.mx |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Clasificación local |
| Koha item type |
Documentos solicitados |
