TY  - BOOK
AU  - Bormuth,Matthias
ED  - SpringerLink (Online service)
TI  - Life conduct in modern times: Karl Jaspers and psychoanalysis 
SN  - 9781402047657
U1  - 170 23
PY  - 2006///
CY  - Dordrecht
PB  - Springer Netherlands
KW  - PHILOSOPHY (GENERAL)
KW  - ETHICS
KW  - PHILOSOPHY
N1  - The Critique of Psychoanalysis 1913-1920 -- Life Conduct in Modern Times -- Critique of Psychoanalysis in 1931 -- Critique of Psychoanalysis in 1941 -- The Founding of the Psychosomatic Clinic in Heidelberg 1946-1949 -- Critique of Psychoanalytic Psychosomatics 1949-1953 -- On the Critique of Psychoanalysis and Society 1950-1968 -- Summary and Prospective View
N2  - The German version of this book received the main award in 2001 of the prestigious Stehr-Boldt-Fonds of the University of Zürich for scientific research combining questions of medical ethics with social interest. This award-winning book investigates the critique of psychoanalysis formulated by the psychiatrist and philosopher Karl Jaspers (1883-1969) over a period of five decades. His arguments against Freud and his followers are examined from systematic perspectives. The study traces the medico-historical roots of Jasper's criticism of psychoanalysis and then places it within the framework of scientific theory before devoting itself extensively to medico-ethical aspects of the controversy, which are ultimately treated in terms of a history of mentalities. According to this view, Jasper's student Hannah Arendt saw to it that the philosopher be made aware of the socio-cultural impact which psychoanalysis was beginning to have in the U.S.A. The philosopher came to look upon psychoanalysis as a theory - in particular as it was propagated after 1945 in Germany and the U.S. - whose claim to scientific objectivity constituted a serious threat to the freedom of the individual. Max Weber's theory of science and his concept of modernity serve as a critical guide for the interpretation. Thus the normative premise of the investigation is the liberal idea that in a secular and pluralistic society it is ultimately the individual who is to take responsibility for life conduct
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4765-7
ER  -