| 000 | 01338nam a2200193Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | MX-MdCICY | ||
| 005 | 20250625140625.0 | ||
| 040 | _cCICY | ||
| 090 | _aB-10084 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aModels for conflict resolution in ecosystem management |
| 490 | 0 | _vSocio-Economic Planning Sciences, 33, p.61-84, 1999 | |
| 520 | 3 | _aTools developed in the ®elds of decision analysis and game theory that have potential for use in public sector con¯ict resolution are reviewed. The strengths and weaknesses, as well as the axioms de®ning principles of fairness, are examined for multiobjective optimization, Nash and Nash±Harsanyi solutions, voting models, and the Shapley value. The case of con¯ict between stakeholders over proposed oil and gas leasing on National Forest System lands is presented as a sample application. We conclude that the Shapley value is the appropriate approach for etermining the ``fairness'' of alternative con¯ict solutions, at least in those situations where cardinal utilities can be estimated. | |
| 700 | 1 | 2 | _aShields, D.J. |
| 700 | 1 | 2 | _aTolwinski, B. |
| 700 | 1 | 2 | _aKent, B.M. |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1k_XDMRcHoiRsxjQby4iKi_7e7xDep3Qw/view?usp=drivesdk _zPara ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta: @cicy.edu.mx |
| 942 |
_2Loc _cREF1 |
||
| 008 | 250602s9999 xx |||||s2 |||| ||und|d | ||
| 999 |
_c44325 _d44325 |
||