000 02955nam a2200313Ia 4500
003 MX-MdCICY
005 20250625153947.0
040 _cCICY
090 _aB-14759
245 1 0 _aSecond generation biofuels and bioinvasions: An evaluation of invasive risks and policy responses in the United States and Canada
490 0 _vRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, p.30-42, 2013
520 3 _aBiofuels are being embraced worldwide as sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels, because of their potential to promote energy security and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, while providing opportu-nities for job creation and economic diversification. However, biofuel production also raises a number of environmental concerns. One of these is the risk of biological invasion, which is a key issue with second generation biofuel crops derived from fast-growing perennial grasses and woody plant species. Many of the most popular second generation crops proposed for cultivation in the U.S. and Canada are not native to North America, and some are known to be invasive. The development of a large-scale biofuel industry on the continent could lead to the widespread introduction, establishment, and spread of invasive plant species if invasive risks are not properly considered as part of biofuel policy. In this paper, we evaluate the risk of biological invasion posed by the emerging second generation biofuel industry in the U.S. and Canada by examining the invasive risk of candidate biofuel plant species, and reviewing existing biofuel policies to determine how well they address the issue of invasive species. Wefind that numerous potentially invasive plant species are being considered for biofuel production in the U.S. and Canada, yet invasive risk receives little to no attention in these countries' biofuel policies. We identify several barriers to integrating invasive species and biofuel policy, relating to policy analytical capacity, governance, and conflicting policy objectives. We recommend that governments act now, while the second generation biofuel industry is in its infancy, to develop robust and proactive policy addressing invasive risk. Policy options to minimize biological invasions include banning the use of known invasive plant species, ongoing monitoring of approved species, and use of buffer zones around cultivated areas.
650 1 4 _aBIOFUELS
650 1 4 _aBIOLOGICAL INVASION
650 1 4 _aINVASIVE SPECIES
650 1 4 _aSECOND GENERATION
650 1 4 _aPOLICY
650 1 4 _aRISK
700 1 2 _aSmith, A.L.
700 1 2 _aKlenk, N.
700 1 2 _aWood, S.
700 1 2 _aHewitt, N.
700 1 2 _aHenriques, I.
700 1 2 _aYan, N.
700 1 2 _aBazely, D.R.
856 4 0 _uhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1yL18ahIvq9HnALD1EOQMSETsK1hK8CYK/view?usp=drivesdk
_zPara ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta: @cicy.edu.mx
942 _2Loc
_cREF1
008 250602s9999 xx |||||s2 |||| ||und|d
999 _c48944
_d48944