000 03385nam a2200517Ia 4500
003 MX-MdCICY
005 20250625160149.0
040 _cCICY
090 _aB-16322
245 1 0 _aAllelopathic potential of some tropical trees of Ecological Reserve El Eden, Quintana Roo, Mexico
490 0 _vAllelopathy Journal, 21(1), p.57-72, 2008
520 3 _aWe investigated the allelopathic potential of leaves of six tropical trees (Jatropha gaumeri, Pedilanthus tithymaloides, Sebastiania adenophora, Zuelania guidonia, Zanthoxylum caribaeum and Heliocarpus sp.)from the Ecological Reserve El Eden, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Aqueous leachates from dry leaves (1 percent)were tested in vitro on the root growth of 7 test plants [Echinochloa crus-galli, Lolium multiflorum, Zea mays, Amaranthus hypochondriacus, Lycopersicon esculentum, Phaseolus vulgaris and Cucurbita pepo (ungerminated and pre-germinated)] and the diameter growth of 3 phytopathogenic fungi [Alternaria sp., Fusarium oxysporum and Helminthosporium sp]. Aqueous leachates of P. tithymaloides, S. adenophora, Z. caribaeum, J. gaumeri and Heliocarpus sp. were most phytotoxic. S. adenophora and Heliocarpus sp. aqueous leachates inhibited the growth diameter of all phytopathogenic fungi. We did two greenhouse pot experiments in soil amended with leaves (2 percent w/w)of 3 highly phytotoxic species (J. gaumeri, S. adenophora and Z. guidonia), and tested their decomposition effects on the (i)emergence of weeds in pots, (ii)the growth of bean and tomato, (iii)the colonization of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM)fungi in roots of both crops and (iv)the development of Rhizobium nodules in bean roots. The dicots weeds were more abundant than monocots in bean and tomato pots. The weeds were less in bean pots than tomato pots. In bean pots, dicotyledon weeds were more abundant with J. gaumeri and S. adenophora amended leaves. Beans dry weight was not affected by any treatment, but tomato was significantly reduced in all treatments. Colonization of AM fungi in bean roots was less than control, but contrarily, S. adenophora leaves significantly stimulated them in tomato roots. All treatments significantly stimulated the Rhizobium nodules in bean roots.
650 1 4 _aADENOPHORA
650 1 4 _aALTERNARIA
650 1 4 _aAMARANTHUS
650 1 4 _aAMARANTHUS HYPOCHONDRIACUS
650 1 4 _aARBUSCULAR
650 1 4 _aCUCURBITA PEPO
650 1 4 _aDICOTYLEDONEAE
650 1 4 _aECHINOCHLOA
650 1 4 _aECHINOCHLOA CRUS-GALLI
650 1 4 _aFUNGI
650 1 4 _aFUSARIUM OXYSPORUM
650 1 4 _aHELIOCARPUS
650 1 4 _aHELMINTHOSPORIUM
650 1 4 _aHYPHOMYCETES
650 1 4 _aJATROPHA
650 1 4 _aJATROPHA
650 1 4 _aLOLIUM
650 1 4 _aLOLIUM MULTIFLORUM
650 1 4 _aLYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM
650 1 4 _aPEDILANTHUS TITHYMALOIDES
650 1 4 _aPHASEOLUS VULGARIS
650 1 4 _aRHIZOBIUM
650 1 4 _aSEBASTIANIA
650 1 4 _aZANTHOXYLUM
650 1 4 _aZANTHOXYLUM CARIBAEUM
650 1 4 _aZEA MAYS
650 1 4 _aZUELANIA GUIDONIA
700 1 2 _aDel Carmen Flores-Carmona, M.
700 1 2 _aCruz-Ortega, R.
700 1 2 _aAnaya, A.L.
856 4 0 _uhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/11b1IgHBT8eWlXzwJRRLzpATJXShKbBxx/view?usp=drivesdk
_zPara ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta: @cicy.edu.mx
942 _2Loc
_cREF1
008 250602s9999 xx |||||s2 |||| ||und|d
999 _c50496
_d50496