000			01926nam a2200325Ia 4500
003			MX-MdCICY
005			20250625160218.0
040			_cCICY
090			_aB-17835
245	1	0	_aA comparison of reflection and transmission ultrasonic techniques for measurement of cancellous bone elasticity
490	0		_vJournal of Biomechanics, 27(9), p.1195-1199, 1994
520	3		_aA reflection ultrasonic technique, which offers several advantages over transmission ultrasonic techniques, has been described for elastic property measurement of bone. Ultrasonic velocities from specimens of cancellous bone were compared using a reflection ultrasound technique and the more traditional transmission ultrasonic technique. The two techniques were found to yield velocities which were reasonably well correlated (r2 = 0.74). However, a statistical difference was found between the line of identity and the regression between transmission and reflection velocities (due to an offset in the intercept). In spite of differences in intercept between velocities measured by the two techniques, significant correlation was found between the two methods, suggesting that the reflection technique can measure wave velocities meaningful to bone elasticity.
650	1	4	_aANGLE MEASUREMENT
650	1	4	_aBONE
650	1	4	_aCORRELATION METHODS
650	1	4	_aELASTICITY
650	1	4	_aREGRESSION ANALYSIS
650	1	4	_aULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS
650	1	4	_aULTRASONIC TRANSMISSION
650	1	4	_aULTRASONIC VELOCITY MEASUREMENT
650	1	4	_aVELOCITY
700	1	2	_aAshman, R. B.
700	1	2	_aAntich, P. P.
700	1	2	_aGonzales, J.
700	1	2	_aAnderson, J. A.
700	1	2	_aRho, J. Y.
856	4	0	_uhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/13GkteGNs8UgkRysq86lNs5lXFOotmOok/view?usp=drivesdk _zPara ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta: @cicy.edu.mx
942			_2Loc _cREF1
008			250602s9999 xx |||||s2 |||| ||und|d
999			_c51996 _d51996