| 000 | 01488nam a2200241Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | MX-MdCICY | ||
| 005 | 20250625162431.0 | ||
| 040 | _cCICY | ||
| 090 | _aB-19483 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aPredictive models aren't for causal inference |
| 490 | 0 | _vEcology Letters, 25(8), p.1741-1745, 2022 | |
| 520 | 3 | _aEcologists often rely on observational data to understand causal relationships. Although observational causal inference methodologies exist, predictive techniques such as model selection based on information criterion (e.g. AIC)remains a common approach used to understand ecological relationships. However, predictive approaches are not appropriate for drawing causal conclusions. Here, we highlight the distinction between predictive and causal inference and show how predictive techniques can lead to biased causal estimates. Instead, we encourage ecologists to valid causal inference methods such as the backdoor criterion, a graphical rule that can be used to determine causal relationships across observational studies. | |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | _aBACK-DOOR CRITERION |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | _aCAUSAL INFERENCE |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | _aDIRECTED ACYCLIC GRAPHS (DAGS) |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | _aMODEL SELECTION |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | _aPREDICTION |
| 700 | 1 | 2 | _aArif, S. |
| 700 | 1 | 2 | _aMacneil, A. |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1LG_sWNGm5_3RZ0pmuLpMCNHawG4zQ2jV/view?usp=drivesdk _zPara ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta: @cicy.edu.mx |
| 942 |
_2Loc _cREF1 |
||
| 008 | 250602s9999 xx |||||s2 |||| ||und|d | ||
| 999 |
_c53609 _d53609 |
||