| 000 | 02796nam a2200325Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | MX-MdCICY | ||
| 005 | 20250625164351.0 | ||
| 040 | _cCICY | ||
| 090 | _aB-21221 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aPattern-Triggered Immunity and Effector-Triggered Immunity: crosstalk and cooperation of PRR and NLR-mediated plant defense pathways during host-pathogen interactions. |
| 490 | 0 | _aPhysiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 30(4), 587-604, 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-024-01452-7 | |
| 520 | 3 | _aThe elucidation of the molecular basis underlying plant-pathogen interactions is imperative for the development of sustainable resistance strategies against pathogens. Plants employ a dual-layered immunological detection and response system wherein cell surface-localized Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) and intracellular Nucleotide-Binding Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptors (NLRs) play pivotal roles in initiating downstream signalling cascades in response to pathogen-derived chemicals. Pattern-Triggered Immunity (PTI) is associated with PRRs and is activated by the recognition of conserved molecular structures, known as Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns. When PTI proves ineffective due to pathogenic effectors, Effector-Triggered Immunity (ETI) frequently confers resistance. In ETI, host plants utilize NLRs to detect pathogen effectors directly or indirectly, prompting a rapid and more robust defense response. Additionally epigenetic mechanisms are participating in plant immune memory. Recently developed technologies like CRISPR/Cas9 helps in exposing novel prospects in plant pathogen interactions. In this review we explore the fascinating crosstalk and cooperation between PRRs and NLRs. We discuss epigenomic processes and CRISPR/Cas9 regulating immune response in plants and recent findings that shed light on the coordination of these defense layers. Furthermore, we also have discussed the intricate interactions between the salicylic acid and jasmonic acid signalling pathways in plants, offering insights into potential synergistic interactions that would be harnessed for the development of novel and sustainable resistance strategies against diverse group of pathogens. | |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | _aPLANT IMMUNITY |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | _aEFECTOR |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | _aPRR |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | _aPTI |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | _aPATHOGEN |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | _aSIGNALLING |
| 650 | 1 | 4 | _aPERCEPTION |
| 700 | 1 | 2 | _aNabi, Z. |
| 700 | 1 | 2 | _aManzoor, S. |
| 700 | 1 | 2 | _aNabi, S. U. |
| 700 | 1 | 2 | _aWani, T. A. |
| 700 | 1 | 2 | _aGulzar, H. |
| 700 | 1 | 2 | _aFarooq, M. |
| 700 | 1 | 2 | _aMansoor, S. |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1PpX5BjwjoF3lg6sVxHC-Jz5Ri3Hf0XGR/view?usp=drivesdk _zPara ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta @cicy.edu.mx |
| 942 |
_2Loc _cREF1 |
||
| 008 | 250602s9999 xx |||||s2 |||| ||und|d | ||
| 999 |
_c55292 _d55292 |
||