000			04217nam a22005175i 4500
001			978-1-4020-3754-2
003			DE-He213
005			20251006084459.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			100301s2005 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9781402037542
020			_a99781402037542
024	7		_a10.1007/1-4020-3754-6 _2doi
082	0	4	_a10 _223
100	1		_aMaasen, Sabine. _eeditor.
245	1	0	_aDemocratization of Expertise? _h[electronic resource] : _bExploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making / _cedited by Sabine Maasen, Peter Weingart.
264		1	_aDordrecht : _bSpringer Netherlands, _c2005.
300			_aVII, 236 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
490	1		_aSociology of the Sciences Yearbook, _x0167-2320 ; _v24
505	0		_aWhat's New in Scientific Advice to Politics? -- Bioethical Controversies and Policy Advice: The Production of Ethical Expertise and its Role in the Substantiation of Political Decision-Making -- Advisory Systems in Pluralistic Knowledge Societies: A Criteria-Based Typology to Assess and Optimize Environmental Policy Advice -- Institutional Design for Socially Robust Knowledge: The National Toxicology Program's Report on Carcinogens -- Representation, Expertise, and the German Parliament: A Comparison of Three Advisory Institutions -- Expertise and Political Responsibility: The Columbia Shuttle Catastrophe -- Knowledge and Decision-Making -- Science/Policy Boundaries: A Changing Division of Labour in Dutch Expert Policy Advice -- Inserting the Public Into Science -- Between Policy and Politics -- Participation as Knowledge Production and the Limits of Democracy -- Judgment Under Siege: The Three-Body Problem of Expert Legitimacy.
520			_a'Scientific advice to politics', the 'nature of expertise', and the 'relation between experts, policymakers, and the public' are variations of a topic that currently attracts the attention of social scientists, philosophers of science as well as practitioners in the public sphere and the media. This renewed interest in a persistent theme is initiated by the call for a democratization of expertise that has become the order of the day in the legitimation of research funding. The new significance of 'participation' and 'accountability' has motivated scholars to take a new look at the science - politics interface and to probe questions such as "What is new in the arrangement of scientific expertise and political decision-making?", "How can reliable knowledge be made useful for politics and society at large, and how can epistemically and ethically sound decisions be achieved without losing democratic legitimacy?", "How can the objective of democratization of expertise be achieved without compromising the quality and reliability of knowledge?" Scientific knowledge and the 'experts' that represent it no longer command the unquestioned authority and public trust that was once bestowed upon them, and yet, policy makers are more dependent on them than ever before. This collection of essays explores the relations between science and politics with the instruments of social studies of science, thereby providing new insights into their re-alignment under a new régime of governance.
650		0	_aPHILOSOPHY (GENERAL).
650		0	_aSCIENCE _xPHILOSOPHY.
650		0	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE _xPHILOSOPHY.
650		0	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE.
650		0	_aSOCIOLOGY.
650	1	4	_aPHILOSOPHY.
650	2	4	_aPHILOSOPHY.
650	2	4	_aPHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE.
650	2	4	_aPOLITICAL PHILOSOPHY.
650	2	4	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE.
650	2	4	_aSOCIOLOGY.
700	1		_aWeingart, Peter. _eeditor.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9781402037535
830		0	_aSociology of the Sciences Yearbook, _x0167-2320 ; _v24
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3754-6 _zVer el texto completo en las instalaciones del CICY
912			_aZDB-2-SHU
942			_2ddc _cER
999			_c60591 _d60591