000			03131nam a22003975i 4500
001			978-1-4020-4765-7
003			DE-He213
005			20251006084514.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			100301s2006 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9781402047657
020			_a99781402047657
024	7		_a10.1007/1-4020-4765-7 _2doi
082	0	4	_a170 _223
100	1		_aBormuth, Matthias. _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aLife conduct in modern times _h[electronic resource] : _bKarl Jaspers and psychoanalysis / _cby Matthias Bormuth.
264		1	_aDordrecht : _bSpringer Netherlands, _c2006.
300			_aXII, 173 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0		_aThe Critique of Psychoanalysis 1913-1920 -- Life Conduct in Modern Times -- Critique of Psychoanalysis in 1931 -- Critique of Psychoanalysis in 1941 -- The Founding of the Psychosomatic Clinic in Heidelberg 1946-1949 -- Critique of Psychoanalytic Psychosomatics 1949-1953 -- On the Critique of Psychoanalysis and Society 1950-1968 -- Summary and Prospective View.
520			_aThe German version of this book received the main award in 2001 of the prestigious Stehr-Boldt-Fonds of the University of Zürich for scientific research combining questions of medical ethics with social interest. This award-winning book investigates the critique of psychoanalysis formulated by the psychiatrist and philosopher Karl Jaspers (1883-1969) over a period of five decades. His arguments against Freud and his followers are examined from systematic perspectives. The study traces the medico-historical roots of Jasper's criticism of psychoanalysis and then places it within the framework of scientific theory before devoting itself extensively to medico-ethical aspects of the controversy, which are ultimately treated in terms of a history of mentalities. According to this view, Jasper's student Hannah Arendt saw to it that the philosopher be made aware of the socio-cultural impact which psychoanalysis was beginning to have in the U.S.A. The philosopher came to look upon psychoanalysis as a theory - in particular as it was propagated after 1945 in Germany and the U.S. - whose claim to scientific objectivity constituted a serious threat to the freedom of the individual. Max Weber's theory of science and his concept of modernity serve as a critical guide for the interpretation. Thus the normative premise of the investigation is the liberal idea that in a secular and pluralistic society it is ultimately the individual who is to take responsibility for life conduct.
650		0	_aPHILOSOPHY (GENERAL).
650		0	_aETHICS.
650	1	4	_aPHILOSOPHY.
650	2	4	_aETHICS.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9781402047640
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4765-7 _zVer el texto completo en las instalaciones del CICY
912			_aZDB-2-SHU
942			_2ddc _cER
999			_c61002 _d61002