000			03532nam a22004815i 4500
001			978-1-4020-4939-2
003			DE-He213
005			20251006084516.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			100301s2006 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9781402049392
020			_a99781402049392
024	7		_a10.1007/1-4020-4939-0 _2doi
082	0	4	_a340.1 _223
100	1		_aStelmach, Jerzy. _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aMethods of legal reasoning _h[electronic resource] / _cby Jerzy Stelmach, Bartosz Brozek.
264		1	_aDordrecht : _bSpringer Netherlands, _c2006.
300			_aIX, 234 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0		_aPart I. Controversy over legal methodology in the 19th and 20th centuries. 1. Three stances. 2. Methods of legal reasoning. 3. Logic - analysis - argumentation - hermeneutics -- Part II. Logic. 1. Introduction. 2. Classical logic: propositional logic and first order predicate logic. 3. Deontic logic. 4. Logic of action and logic of norms. 5. Defeasible logic. 6. Summary -- Part III. Analysis. 1. Introduction. 2. Linguistic analysis. 3. Economic analysis of law. 4. Summary -- Part IV. Argumentation. 1. Introduction. 2. Two conceptions of a legal discourse. 3. Legal argumentation -- Part V. Hermeneutics. 1. Introduction. 2. Hermeneutics as epistemology. 3. Hermeneutics as ontology. 4. The understanding of the law -- Part VI. Methods of legal reasoning from a post-modern perspective. 1. A summary. 2. Dilemmas of the contemporary philosophy of law. 3. The epistemological approach. 4. Unfinished projects.
520			_aThe book attempts to describe and criticize four methods used in legal practice, legal dogmatics and legal theory: logic, analysis, argumentation and hermeneutics. Apart from a presentation of basic ideas connected with the above mentioned methods, the essays contained in this book seek to answer questions concerning the assumptions standing behind these methods, the limits of using them and their usefulness in the practice and theory of law. A specific feature of the book is that in one study four different, sometimes competing concepts of legal method are discussed. The panorama, sketched like this, allows one to reflect deeply on the questions concerning the methodological conditioning of legal science and the existence of a unique, specific legal method. The authors argue that there exists no such method. They claim that the methodologies presented in the book may serve as a basis for constructing a coherent and useful conception of legal thinking. Any such conception, however, must recognize its own assumptions and limitations, resulting from adopting a specific philosophical stance.
650		0	_aLAW.
650		0	_aLOGIC.
650		0	_aPHILOSOPHY OF LAW.
650		0	_aSOCIAL SCIENCES _xPHILOSOPHY.
650		0	_aLAW _xPHILOSOPHY.
650	1	4	_aLAW.
650	2	4	_aLAW THEORY/LAW PHILOSOPHY.
650	2	4	_aPHILOSOPHY OF LAW.
650	2	4	_aPHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES.
650	2	4	_aLOGIC.
700	1		_aBrozek, Bartosz. _eauthor.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9781402049361
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4939-0 _zVer el texto completo en las instalaciones del CICY
912			_aZDB-2-SHU
942			_2ddc _cER
999			_c61065 _d61065