000			03535nam a22004815i 4500
001			978-1-4020-5310-8
003			DE-He213
005			20251006084520.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			100301s2007 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9781402053108
020			_a99781402053108
024	7		_a10.1007/978-1-4020-5310-8 _2doi
082	0	4	_a300 _223
100	1		_aKucera, David. _eeditor.
245	1	0	_aQualitative Indicators of Labour Standards _h[electronic resource] : _bComparative Methods and Applications / _cedited by David Kucera.
264		1	_aDordrecht : _bSpringer Netherlands, _c2007.
300			_aV, 296 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
490	1		_aSocial Indicators Research Series, _x1387-6570 ; _v30
505	0		_aand Overview -- Indicators of Labour Standards: An Overview and Comparison -- Country-level Assessments of Labour Conditions in Emerging Markets: An Approach for Institutional Investors -- Decent Work, Standards and Indicators -- The Quantification of Respect for Selected Core Labour Standards: Towards a Social Development Index? -- Measuring Trade Union Rights by Violations of These Rights -- Taking Labour Laws to the Domestic Dentist: Measuring Countries' Compliance with International Labour Non-discrimination Standards -- Towards an Index of Core Rights Gaps -- Employment Protection in Industrialized Countries: The Case for New Indicators -- Measuring Concealed Rights Violations: The Case of Forced Labour.
520			_aRecent years have witnessed a rapidly growing interest in the use and construction of "qualitative" indicators of labour standards. Qualitative indicators, while generally having numerical values, are based on such methods as grading by experts, the coding of legislation, and the coding of other textual sources addressing violations of a more de facto nature. Measuring compliance with labour standards is an undertaking intrinsically fraught with difficulty. For there are a number of possible sources of measurement error, both random and non-random, that are unique to such indicators, on top of those that affect qualitative and quantitative indicators alike. The growing use of qualitative indicators of labour standards thus raises a number of questions about comparative methods of construction as well as the appropriateness of particular methods for particular applications. This volume results from a seminar that was organized by the International Labour Office (ILO) to address these and related questions, bringing together experts from the ILO, universities and NGOs.
650		0	_aCOMPARATIVE LAW.
650		0	_aSTATISTICS.
650		0	_aCOMMERCIAL LAW.
650		0	_aSOCIAL SCIENCES.
650	1	4	_aSOCIAL SCIENCES, GENERAL.
650	2	4	_aSOCIAL SCIENCES, GENERAL.
650	2	4	_aINTERNATIONAL & FOREIGN LAW/COMPARATIVE LAW.
650	2	4	_aSTATISTICS FOR SOCIAL SCIENCE, BEHAVORIAL SCIENCE, EDUCATION, PUBLIC POLICY, AND LAW.
650	2	4	_aLAW AND ECONOMICS.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9781402052002
830		0	_aSocial Indicators Research Series, _x1387-6570 ; _v30
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5310-8 _zVer el texto completo en las instalaciones del CICY
912			_aZDB-2-SHU
942			_2ddc _cER
999			_c61221 _d61221